I really enjoy reading Dan Graur posts at his Judge Starling blog. Dan is fun and one of the good people fighting for good science (in a very cranky way). Because Dan can be pretty blunt in putting down dubious and exaggerated claims, I sometimes ask myself "am I stating something terminally stupid? Will Dan make fun of me at Judge Starling? [1]". That's a good way of keeping focus on what I can legitimately infer and what I just want to read in my results, and I like that. On a similar note I can recommend Lior Pachter's blog.
[1] Almost surely I fly well Below's Dan's radar, so I doubt he'd actually take me to task, but that's not the point, is it?
[1] Almost surely I fly well Below's Dan's radar, so I doubt he'd actually take me to task, but that's not the point, is it?
RSS Feed
